Strengthen democratic ideas and values
In the last 30 years, civil society organizations (CSOs)
have worked throughout the Pakistan to support democracy and democratic
governance. CSOs have been active in promoting participation, advocating for
transparency and accountability and defending human rights, working together
with governments and the international community. Governments and citizens have
made progress. With few exceptions in the last 30 years the region has
experienced regular, uninterrupted cycles of democratic elections and the reform
of key institutions. Yet democracies remain fragile and traditional challenges
have been compounded by emerging manifestations that threaten the stability of
the State. These new trends not only underscore the necessity of sustained
civil society activity, but also bring added complexity to the work of CSOs and
call for a reflection on experiences and approaches to date. In spite of
progress in the consolidation of democracy, the evolution of norms and
international mechanisms and the development of civil society, Pakistan face
serious governance challenges. Institutions central to the exercise of
democracy continue to be weak, lack transparency and suffer from low
credibility. The management of social demands is largely inefficient and myriad
social problems persist despite economic growth. Large segments of the
citizenry remain alienated from decision-making, often the purview of a small
elite. In many places, protest and instability are a constant threat to peace
and security. Meanwhile, previously un-encountered circumstances are emerging
to provide new threats to democratic stability, as traditional military coups
have given way to neo-populist forces, increased pressure from non state actors
and paralyzing executive-legislative gridlock.
Structural Challenges Before making strategic
recommendations about future civil society initiatives, participants began by
examining some of these existing and emerging challenges. In discussing
persisting problems and their new manifestations participants concurred that
the challenges to democracy today find a common origin in the extreme poverty
and inequality. Indeed, expectations that democratization would improve
material conditions by redistributing power and resources remain largely
unfulfilled, and economic marginalization and discrimination persist for the
majority of citizens. Participants noted that these circumstances endure
because the negotiation process that established democratic regimes left out
large segments of the population in a majority of countries, resulting in a
lack of a broad consensus on rules and long-term national objectives. While the
democratic structures and institutions have been put in place, many systems
continue to work according to old social arrangements and rules centered on exclusion
and control that favor the interests of a narrow elite. As a result, electoral
democracies are not democracies of citizens. Despite regularly exercising the
vote, citizens’ concerns are often not reflected or their rights protected by
elected officials in policy-making and governance decisions. The states’
failure to respond to citizens’ needs despite economic growth has created
disillusionment with democracy. The core problems of poverty, lack of
representation and inequality ,and attendant violence, corruption and
polarization require complex and long-term solutions, which must be based on
strengthening fundamental elements and principles in societies across the
region. Among these elements is the need for information and ideas that provide
citizens, politicians and policy-makers with a common basis for informed
discussion and decision-making. Second, is the need for pluralism and respect
for difference of opinion. Third, is the need for consensus-building techniques
that allow citizens to reach agreement and identify common objectives for
national life at the local and national level. Finally, there is a need for
heightened transparency and accountability in government activity to ensure
that these shared visions are being implemented by elected officials.
Priority Activities: Civil Society Strongholds Thinking
about the elements needed for strengthened democracy, and civil societies’
strengths and limitations, participants highlighted activities considered key
CSOs strongholds—areas where civil society can have a particularly positive
impact. In most cases CSOs across the region are already undertaking a number
of these activities. Some areas, however, will require learning on the part of
organizations, and may necessitate a refocusing of objectives, partners and
methodologies.
Promote Dialogue
In discussing
challenges to democracy, including a lack of broad-based consensus on basic
national principles, polarization and marginalization, the need to create
spaces for debate and dialogue was underscored. Such spaces bring people
together and provide an opportunity to discuss issues and share different
points of view, which is essential in reaching compromise and a shared
direction. An autonomous and moderate civil society can help bridge divides
between groups and work to build social and political consensus, while
contributing to pluralism and promoting tolerance. To do this, they must engage
a broad range of society on a wide array of issues at the local and national
level. CSOs throughout the District Tharparkar must do much more to foster
productive dialogue, building understanding and a strengthening a tolerant
middle ground.
No comments:
Post a Comment